-
Type:
Task
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
None
-
Server Programmability
-
Programmability 2025-05-26, Programmability 2025-06-09, Programmability 2025-06-23, Programmability 2025-07-07
-
None
-
3
-
TBD
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
0
Attempting to use an Atomic<int64_t> for a server parameter type in IDL fails to compile, even though int64_t is a supported type in IDL-- behavior like this is surprising and slows down the development process when developers have to work around constraints of IDL types when using Atomics that they don't have to work around when using the types directly.