Cancellation should always cancel sub operations

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Server Programmability
    • 200
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      We have tools like sub baton and scoped executor but they have different answers for the cancellation problem. This creates confusion. For example BF-40490 where a wait operation would not be cancelled properly when a ARS died, and another ARS would resume the execution of the dead backoff.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Guillaume Racicot
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: