-
Type:
Task
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Replication
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
In doing SERVER-119413 we found that we had been checking for the type of the configVersion field when we should have been checking the configTerm field. This means we clearly have a gap in unit testing that should have caught this. We should audit the rest of this class for other issues and beef up our unit tests
- is related to
-
SERVER-119413 configTerm is expected as an int32 but can be an int64
-
- Closed
-