Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Type: Task
Resolution: Unresolved
Priority: Major - P3
Fix Version/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Component/s: None
Labels:
None

Assigned Teams:

Query Optimization
CAR Domain/s:
None

Aha! Reference:
None
Tracking Level:
None
Risk Status:
None
Exec Notes:
None
Goal Name(s):
None
Goal Link:
None

After the latest cost model changes (~~SERVER-122265~~ & ~~SERVER-122631~~), we should redo our analysis of TPC-H on Scale Factor 1 and verify whether we're getting near-optimal plans for all queries.

is related to

SERVER-122631 Reuse CBR costing in join optimization for single table accesses

Closed

SERVER-122265 [Join Optimization] Costing of INLJ ignores cost of sorted-sparse I/O to fetch records from collection

Closed

Assignee:: Unassigned
Reporter:: Max Verbinnen
Participants:: Max Verbinnen
Votes:: 0 Vote for this issue
Watchers:: 2 Start watching this issue

Created:: Apr 22 2026 10:07:10 AM UTC
Updated:: Apr 22 2026 10:08:54 AM UTC

Details

Description

Attachments

Issue Links

Activity

People

Dates