Check for coverage gaps in new implementation of traverseRecordStore

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Storage Execution
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      under SERVER-128372, we made traverseRecordStore a 'pure-ish' function to support parallelism. while the base validate tests pass, check if we're missing any coverage gaps around the validate code.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Ayesha Islam
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: