-
Type:
Improvement
-
Resolution: Incomplete
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Storage
-
None
-
None
-
3
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
I have the following observations from WiredTiger stack that i investigated:
1) WT use calloc for heap operations, malloc should be cheaper to use.
2) I also suggest using Low fragmentation heap (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366750%28v=vs.85%29.aspx), we have something like LFH implemented in MMAP
1) i opened this as FYI, in case we have to improve this now
2) Please assign this to me and i will create the workload that measured the impact post 2.8
Eitan