-
Type: Question
-
Resolution: Done
-
Priority: Minor - P4
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: 3.0.0
-
Component/s: Aggregation Framework, Performance, WiredTiger
-
None
Performance comparison for MMAPv1 and WiredTiger
1. Write performance is good when using wiredtiger as a storage engine.
2. But read performance is very poor compared to MMAPv1 engine.
Hardware Configuration: Ubuntu 12.04
CPU Cores: 2
RAM: 8GB
We ran scenarios with both MMAP and wiredtiger using the same above hardware configurations. Now we finally are in a position to conclude that MMAP gives us a better performance compared to WiredTiger engine.
Help would be appreciated.
Is there any specific configuration params available to increase the read performance.