Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Type: Task
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major - P3
Fix Version/s: 6.1.0-rc0
Affects Version/s: None
Component/s: Sharding
Labels:
- pm-564

Backwards Compatibility:
Fully Compatible
Sprint:
Sharding EMEA 2022-05-02, Sharding EMEA 2022-05-16, Sharding EMEA 2022-05-30
Confidence Status:
None
Work Order:
3

Aha! Reference:
None
Tracking Level:
None
Risk Status:
None
Exec Notes:
None
Goal Name:
None
Goal Link:
None

Now that all chunk operations run in specialized config server commands, those commands can just do their multi-doc transaction writes directly in a single WUOW, there's no need to rely on applyOps/doTxn machinery. Doing this for 4.0 would allow us to remove support for atomic applyOps in 4.0, which is something the repl team is quite interested in.

depends on

SERVER-65836 Change applyOps for internal transactions in commitChunkMigration

Closed

SERVER-65837 Use internal transactions instead of applyOps in removeShard

Closed

SERVER-65838 Remove applyOpsDeprecated usage from split/merge chunk functions

Closed

is depended on by

SERVER-33325 review use of "b" field in applyOps update operations in sharding_catalog_manager_chunk_operations.cpp

Closed

SERVER-33182 Remove atomic applyOps

Closed

is duplicated by

SERVER-53502 Consider introducing fine grained chunk locks

Closed

is related to

SERVER-58026 Omitted FTDC sections cause frequent schema changes that limit FTDC retention

Backlog

related to

SERVER-65531 Crash when running applyOps command with "needsRetryImage" option

Backlog

SERVER-65774 applyOps command does not to write to config.image_collection on secondaries in some cases

Backlog

SERVER-50381 3 way deadlock between applyOps cmd, prepared transaction and secondary oplog fetcher initiated find command

Closed

SERVER-65553 Atomic applyOps generates a change stream pre-image on secondaries but not on the primary

Closed

SERVER-64972 Generate change stream events for batched deletes

Closed

SERVER-36263 Bypassing operation validation in applyOps should require special privilege

Closed

(1 is duplicated by, 1 is related to, 6 related to)

Assignee:: Marcos José Grillo Ramirez

Reporter:: Spencer Brody (Inactive)

Participants:: Githook User, Marcos José Grillo Ramirez, Spencer Brody, Suganthi Mani

Votes:: 1 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 14 Start watching this issue

Created:: Feb 14 2018 04:17:55 PM UTC

Updated:: Oct 29 2023 10:34:43 PM UTC

Resolved:: May 24 2022 10:01:40 AM UTC

Confidence Status Last Update:: 19/May/22 5:47 PM

Details

Description

Attachments

Issue Links

Activity

People

Dates