Uploaded image for project: 'Core Server'
  1. Core Server
  2. SERVER-43598

TLA+ Trace Checker paper: "Related Work" section

    • Type: Icon: New Feature New Feature
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Icon: Major - P3 Major - P3
    • 4.3.4
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Replication
    • Labels:
      None
    • Fully Compatible
    • Repl 2020-01-13, Repl 2020-01-27, Repl 2020-02-10, Repl 2020-02-24

      From "How to Write a Technical Paper: Structure and Style of the Epitome of your Research":

      The purpose of the related work section is the most misunderstood by young authors. Therefore, it is important
      to pay extra attention in writing this section. Similar
      to the introduction, the purpose of the related work is
      twofold. First, it gives a list of research works that are
      related to your paper—necessary to show what has happened in this field. Secondly, it provides a critique of the
      approaches in the literature—necessary to establish the
      contribution and importance of your paper.
      Providing a related work section shows that you have
      done your “homework”. In this aspect, it is important
      that your related work section be as complete as possible. By complete, it is not meant that you should list all
      the existing publications on the subject—this would be
      somewhat hard but mostly meaningless; on the contrary,
      you should distinguish and describe all the different approaches to the problem. Ideally, a person who chooses to
      focus on the area of your paper should only read your paper to “catch up” with the background work in the field.
      Moreover, a good background work survey will deter the
      possibility that your solution has already been proposed
      by others. In time, you will realize that the most important works are found only in journals or in proceedings of
      major conferences. Although you have probably studied
      publications from other sources, you will end up citing
      only the important ones.
      Critiquing the major approaches of the background
      work will enable you to identify the limitations of the
      other works and show that your research picks up where
      the others left off. This is a great opportunity to demonstrate how your work is different from the rest; for example, show whether you make different assumptions
      and hypotheses, or whether your approach to solving the
      problem differs.

            Assignee:
            jesse@mongodb.com A. Jesse Jiryu Davis
            Reporter:
            jesse@mongodb.com A. Jesse Jiryu Davis
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: