Secondary readers do not need to reacquire PBWM lock if there are catalog conflicts

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • 4.8.0
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Fully Compatible
    • Execution Team 2020-09-21, Execution Team 2020-10-05
    • 23
    • None
    • 3
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      When a read on a secondary uses kLastApplied/kNoOverlap and encounters a collection catalog conflict, it uses a trick to reacquire the PBWM lock and read without a timestamp.

      This was necessary because single-phase background index builds would timestamp writes at future timestamps that may never be seen on secondaries (i.e. "ghost timestamps"). This is not necessary now that simultaneous index builds are the only index builds in 4.5+.

              Assignee:
              Louis Williams
              Reporter:
              Louis Williams
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: