consider renaming avgObjSize in collection stats

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Usability
    • None
    • Storage Execution
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      The name is misleading because

      1) We store documents, not objects
      2) This value is calculated using the sum of all record sizes, which includes padding. It's really the average record size (though calling that would probably produce even more confusion).

      Maybe we could call it sizePerDoc? Other suggestions?

            Assignee:
            [DO NOT USE] Backlog - Storage Execution Team
            Reporter:
            Aaron Staple (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: