-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Replication
-
Minor Change
-
ALL
-
None
-
3
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
... which leads to connections being broken unnecessarily.
One such case - if a majority of members are unchanged and the primary is one of the unchanged members. Ex: one secondary node out of a three-node replica set goes bad and we want to replace it with another good node. If that node being down doesn't require a stepdown, then the node changing shouldn't either?
- depends on
-
-
- Closed
-
- is duplicated by
-
-
- Closed
-
-
-
- Closed
-