Initial tests of write heads vs. insert performance for RecordId format

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Task
    • Resolution: Incomplete
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Serverless
    • Server Serverless 2022-05-30, Server Serverless 2022-06-13
    • None
    • 3
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Ideally in Serverless we would like to shard on hash(_id) and use a RecordId format of (hash(_id), per-hash-counter), where the hash function has low cardinality. This allows split cleanup to be on ranges of RecordId's and merge to "stitch" the record heaps

      But, we might have to choose a very low cardinality to maintain few write heads per shard, and therefore have to refine/reshard most customers to allow them to have more shards.

      This ticket is to do initial tests of write heads vs. insert performance to determine an order of magnitude for a feasible default cardinality.

            Assignee:
            [DO NOT USE] Backlog - Server Serverless (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Esha Maharishi (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: