Details
-
Improvement
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Major - P3
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Fully Compatible
-
Execution Team 2022-10-17
-
120
Description
Currently we archive buckets under memory pressure or if we open a new bucket due to time forwards/backwards. We definitely want to continue to archive buckets under memory pressure, but we may wish to close buckets rather than archive them when we have time forwards/backwards.
If we keep these buckets eligible for query-based reopening, then we would retain good bucketing behavior in out-of-order scenarios, but we wouldn't track truly idle buckets as archived unnecessarily until we run into memory pressure.