Migration or contraction of a tenant’s collections

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Task
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Query Execution
    • None
    • 3
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Some no-op entries that are important for tracking change streams across a sharded cluster would probably not be written with a tenant ID (e.g. migrateChunkToNewShard). This means that in a Serverless sharded cluster, we wouldn’t be able to track the migration or contraction of a tenant’s collections across the shards on which their slices reside. This ticket is about revisiting this case and making any fixes if required.

              Assignee:
              [DO NOT USE] Backlog - Query Execution
              Reporter:
              Rishab Joshi (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: