Uploaded image for project: 'Core Server'
  1. Core Server
  2. SERVER-72697

See if we can directly use the WT storage rather than cached Collection objects

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Major - P3 Major - P3
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Storage Execution

    Description

      Two questions to answer:

      • If we don't have a catalog cache (CollectionCatalog), but always read/write from/to the durable mdb_catalog, can we have a significant reduction in complexity?
      • Can we get OK performance by always going to the durable catalog?

      If we don't have confidence in the first, we should not consider. If we know we cannot achieve the second, we should don't consider either.

      This ticket should probably focus on answering the first question.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            backlog-server-execution Backlog - Storage Execution Team
            geert.bosch@mongodb.com Geert Bosch
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: