Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Type: Improvement
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Minor - P4
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0-rc0
Affects Version/s: None
Component/s: None
Labels:
- neweng
- repl-shortlist

Assigned Teams:

Replication
Backwards Compatibility:
Fully Compatible
Sprint:
Repl 2023-02-20, Repl 2023-03-06
Confidence Status:
None
Work Order:
3

Aha! Reference:
None
Tracking Level:
None
Risk Status:
None
Exec Notes:
None
Goal Name:
None
Goal Link:
None

As part of SERVER-71198 we discovered that the locking performed in the class takes a MODE_X lock for the local database and then performs operation on a single collection without locking it.

Instead the process should take the collection lock via AutoGetCollection in the required mode to avoid unnecessary strong locks in the database.

is duplicated by

SERVER-48399 Writing config document to "local.system.replset" should not acquire database lock in stronger mode (X).

Closed

related to

SERVER-71198 Assert that unkillable operations that take X collection locks do not hold the RSTL

Backlog

Assignee:: Jiawei Yang
Reporter:: Jordi Olivares Provencio
Participants:: Githook User, Jiawei Yang, Jordi Olivares Provencio
Votes:: 0 Vote for this issue
Watchers:: 7 Start watching this issue

Created:: Jan 17 2023 11:32:54 AM UTC
Updated:: Oct 29 2023 09:28:08 PM UTC
Resolved:: Feb 24 2023 11:56:37 PM UTC
Confidence Status Last Update:: 10/Feb/23 9:10 PM