Uploaded image for project: 'Core Server'
  1. Core Server
  2. SERVER-7595

indexOnly is never true when isMultiKey is true

    • Type: Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Priority: Icon: Major - P3 Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Diagnostics, Performance
    • Labels:
      None
    • ALL

      I've noticed that queries on a multiKey index are never indexOnly. Is that true? Seems odd.

      For example if you set up a table as follows:

      db.test.drop();
      db.test.ensureIndex({single: 1, multi: 1});
      db.test.insert({single: 'a', multi: [1,2,3]});
      db.test.insert({single: 'b', multi: [2,3,4]});
      db.test.insert({single: 'a', multi: [3,4,5]});
      db.test.insert({single: 'b', multi: [4,5,6]});
      

      Then querying on 'single' with a readset of just 'single' still gives indexOnly: false, even though the required data should certainly be available in the index:

      > db.test.find({single: 'a'}, {single: 1, _id: 0}).explain()
      {
      	"cursor" : "BtreeCursor single_1_multi_1",
      	"isMultiKey" : true,
      	"n" : 2,
      	"nscannedObjects" : 6,
      	"nscanned" : 6,
      	"nscannedObjectsAllPlans" : 6,
      	"nscannedAllPlans" : 6,
      	"scanAndOrder" : false,
      	"indexOnly" : false,
      	"nYields" : 0,
      	"nChunkSkips" : 0,
      	"millis" : 0,
      	"indexBounds" : {
      		"single" : [
      			[
      				"a",
      				"a"
      			]
      		],
      		"multi" : [
      			[
      				{
      					"$minElement" : 1
      				},
      				{
      					"$maxElement" : 1
      				}
      			]
      		]
      	}
      }
      

      I don't know if this is an actual performance issue or just a problem with explain().

      (Note that this was originally a post in the Google Group, where Max Schireson said I should file a bug: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/mongodb-user/QsZFS4nddHo)

            Assignee:
            aaron Aaron Staple
            Reporter:
            hcooper Harold Cooper
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: