-
Type: Improvement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority: Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
None
-
Storage Execution
-
Minor Change
-
Execution Team 2023-12-11
-
135
I noticed that there is also a cursor cache in server.
WT_CURSOR* WiredTigerSession::getCachedCursor(uint64_t id, const std::string& config) { // Find the most recently used cursor for (CursorCache::iterator i = _cursors.begin(); i != _cursors.end(); ++i) { // Ensure that all properties of this cursor are identical to avoid mixing cursor // configurations. Note that this uses an exact string match, so cursor configurations with // parameters in different orders will not be considered equivalent. if (i->_id == id && i->_config == config) { WT_CURSOR* c = i->_cursor; _cursors.erase(i); _cursorsOut++; return c; } } return nullptr; }
Given that we already have a cursor cache in WiredTiger. I feel this is inefficient and we are duplicating our effort.
Review the background why we do this in server and whether it is beneficial to remove the cache from server and let WiredTiger to handle the cursor cache.
- is related to
-
WT-12153 Reduce overhead of cursor caching
- Open
- related to
-
SERVER-88911 WiredTigerStats reported in curOp can accumulate from previous operations in bulk writes
- In Progress
-
SERVER-89811 Evaluate setting wiredTigerCursorCacheSize to 100
- Closed