Details
-
Improvement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major - P3
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Service Arch
Description
Breaking this portion out from SERVER-81848:
We can assume that zero-init is good enough for some types that aren't trivial init, such as boost::optional (safer since we control the definition) and std::unique_ptr<T> with no custom deleter (slightly more risky since the definition is provided by the toolchain, however it is hard to imagine a practical implementation where zero filling isn't correct, and our tests would explode if it wasn't)
Attachments
Issue Links
- related to
-
SERVER-81848 Make decoration construction eager again
-
- Closed
-