Dropping the physical idents shouldn't invalidate the in-memory catalog.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Storage Execution
    • 200
    • None
    • 3
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      In the BF, we noticed that while preallocating the snapshot for multi-statement transactions during startup recovery as part of reconstructPreparedTransactions(), which is single-threaded, the preallocation might fail and require a retry due to catalog invalidation, even if no other real conflicting threads are present. We found that a concurrent TimestampMonitor thread can drop the physical idents but doesn’t update the on-disk mdb_catalog, which can invalidate the in-memory catalog. I believe dropping physical ident shouldn't invalidate the catalog.

              Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              Suganthi Mani
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: