-
Type:
Task
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:
Hi Keith,
I was looking at the test/format workload below because it is getting stuck with the cache full, but I noticed something else: bulk load gets slower over time. The reason is that __wt_ovfl_reuse_search is doing more and more work: we seem to be tracking all the overflow items?
Here is the config:
############################################ # RUN PARAMETERS ############################################ firstfit=1 # bitcnt not applicable to this run cache=3 compression=none data_extend=0 data_source=file delete_pct=25 dictionary=0 file_type=row-store hot_backups=0 huffman_key=0 huffman_value=0 insert_pct=23 internal_key_truncation=0 internal_page_max=15 key_gap=18 key_max=112 key_min=11 leaf_page_max=10 ops=100000 prefix=1 repeat_data_pct=36 reverse=0 rows=100000 runs=100 split_pct=61 statistics=1 threads=16 value_max=896 value_min=4 # wiredtiger_config not applicable to this run write_pct=46 ############################################
And here is a simple workaround:
Unable to find source-code formatter for language: diff. Available languages are: actionscript, ada, applescript, bash, c, c#, c++, cpp, css, erlang, go, groovy, haskell, html, java, javascript, js, json, lua, none, nyan, objc, perl, php, python, r, rainbow, ruby, scala, sh, sql, swift, visualbasic, xml, yaml
diff --git a/src/btree/rec_write.c b/src/btree/rec_write.c
--- a/src/btree/rec_write.c
+++ b/src/btree/rec_write.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ typedef struct {
uint32_t orig_write_gen;
int upd_skipped; /* Skipped a page's update */
+ int bulk; /* Is this a bulk load? */
+
/*
* Raw compression (don't get me started, as if normal reconciliation
* wasn't bad enough). If an application wants absolute control over
@@ -1993,6 +1995,7 @@ int
WT_RET(__rec_write_init(session, page, 0, &cbulk->reconcile));
r = cbulk->reconcile;
+ r->bulk = 1;
switch (btree->type) {
case BTREE_COL_FIX:
@@ -4481,8 +4484,9 @@ static int
WT_ERR(__wt_bt_write(session, tmp, addr, &size, 0, 0));
/* Track the overflow record. */
- WT_ERR(__wt_ovfl_reuse_add(session, page,
- addr, size, kv->buf.data, kv->buf.size));
+ if (!r->bulk)
+ WT_ERR(__wt_ovfl_reuse_add(session, page,
+ addr, size, kv->buf.data, kv->buf.size));
}
/* Set the callers K/V to reference the overflow record's address. */
Can you please take a look?