-
Type: Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Priority: Unknown
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
Use Case
If the socket times out during read or write, the socket must be closed. Otherwise, the server might respond but the command has already failed in the driver. This results in the next command executed on the socket receiving the response for the previous command.
User Experience
- What is the desired/expected outcome for the user once this ticket is implemented?
- If bug: What is the number of impacted customers? How severe is the impact? Is anyone blocked or broken?
Dependencies
- upstream and/or downstream requirements and timelines to bear in mind
Risks/Unknowns
- What could go wrong while implementing this change? (e.g., performance, inadvertent behavioral changes in adjacent functionality, existing tech debt, etc)
- Is there an opportunity for better cross-driver alignment or testing in this area?
- Is there an opportunity to improve existing documentation on this subject?
Acceptance Criteria
Implementation Requirements
- functional reqs, potential snafus to avoid, performance targets, etc
Testing Requirements
- unit test, spec test sync, etc
Documentation Requirements
- DOCSP ticket, API docs, etc
Follow Up Requirements
- additional tickets to file, required releases, etc
- if node behavior differs/will differ from other drivers, confirm with dbx devs what standard to aim for and what plan, if any, exists to reconcile the diverging behavior moving forward