-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Test Python
-
None
-
Storage Engines - Transactions
-
SE Transactions - 2026-04-10
-
5
In WT-16458, we disabled test_bug010.py in disagg as it started to fail for reasons we could not explain at the time. Furthermore, we found out that is uses backup cursors that are not supported in disagg, so do we need that test?
This ticket should focus on:
- Reproducing the bug by removing the skip_for_hook. The command should be:
python3 ../test/suite/run.py --hook "disagg=(role=leader)" bug010
- Understanding if the bug is related to the changes introduced as part of
WT-16458or if they actually exposed a bug. - Investigating if it's worth keeping this test given it uses backup cursors.
- is related to
-
WT-16458
Unify the mechanisms for updating shared metadata table
-
- Closed
-